This is part 5/5, the final segment of the 5 part series that stemmed from this incident. This segment begins with me asking the cops about the California Supreme Court ruling regarding free speech in shopping malls. Info: ---- Original Incident: Cops Don't Like Being Filmed www.youtube.com Police Internal Affairs Interview -Part 1/5 www.youtube.com Police Internal Affairs Interview Part 2 / 5 www.youtube.com Police Internal Affairs Interview Part 3 / 5 www.youtube.com Police Internal Affairs Interview -Part 4/5 www.youtube.com Police Internal Affairs Interview -Part 5/5 www.youtube.com ---- lawprofessors.typepad.com In Fashion Valley Mall v. NLRB, the California Supreme Court (4-3) reaffirmed its earlier Pruneyard rule. As described by BNA's Daily Labor Report (subscription required): [The Court, in an opinion written by Justice Moreno,] said that the state constitution provides that any person may "speak, write and publish his or her sentiments on all subjects," and that "[a] law may not restrain or abridge liberty of speech or press." In Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center, 23 Cal. 3d 899 (Cal. 1979), Moreno said, California's high court held that the state constitution provided broader protection for free expression than the First Amendment to the US Constitution and that the state constitution protected speech and petitioning in shopping centers even when they were privately owned. . . . ..."A shopping mall is a public forum in which persons may reasonably exercise ...
Tags: alex, jones, new, world, order, police, state, 1st, ammendment, free, speech, 4th, videotape, cops, abuse, freedommv
No comments:
Post a Comment